AX Rush

Prontezza IA di booking.com

Rapporto del sito: 1 pagina misurata. Valutazione complessiva: Discreto.

Punteggio del sito · booking.com

Combina l'origine e 1 pagina misurata. Il report qui sotto dettaglia soltanto la pagina di origine.

booking.com

Discreto · 33 controlli superati, 40 avvisi, 10 controlli non superati · 3,7s

Condividi questo rapporto con il team tecnico

Porta i risultati a chi può risolverli. Copia un riepilogo pronto per Slack, Teams o la prossima riunione.

Email

Questo rapporto è pubblico. Il team può aprirlo senza un account.

Contenuto

36/100

C'è sostanza che un agente possa leggere?

  • Homepage does not serve Markdown via content negotiation

    Serve a Markdown representation of your pages when agents request "Accept: text/markdown". Agents like Claude Code and Cursor ask for it, and Markdown cuts token usage by roughly 80% against HTML. Cloudflare ("Markdown for Agents") and Vercel can enable this without code changes.

  • No <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown"> fallback found on the homepage

    If you cannot enable content negotiation, advertise a Markdown version with <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="/index.md"> so agents can discover it.

  • No JSON-LD structured data found

    Add a <script type="application/ld+json"> block in your HTML <head> with schema.org structured data describing your site, organization, or person.

  • No visible text content in static HTML

    Your homepage appears to be a JavaScript-only shell. Add server-side rendering (Next.js SSR/SSG, Astro, Remix, or a static prerender) so AI agents that do not execute JS can read your content.

  • Low text-to-markup ratio (0.0%)

    A very low text-to-markup ratio is a typical SPA-shell symptom. Inline more content directly into the HTML response.

  • No semantic HTML landmarks found

    Replace generic <div> structures with semantic tags: <main>, <article>, <header>, <nav>, <footer>. Agents use these to identify the primary content region.

  • Single <h1> heading: "JavaScript is disabled"

  • <title> is missing or empty

    Add a <title> in <head> describing the page in 20-70 characters. Agents quote it as the document name.

  • <meta name="description"> is missing

    Add <meta name="description" content="..."> in <head> with a 70-160 character summary. Agents use this as the canonical short description.

  • No <link rel="canonical"> found

    Add <link rel="canonical" href="https://your-site.com/page"> so agents have an unambiguous URL to cite even when crawled via a redirect or query-string variant.

  • <html lang="en">

  • UTF-8 charset declared

  • Viewport meta present: "width=device-width, initial-scale=1"

  • Method note: this reads markup, not a rendered accessibility tree

Accesso

86/100

Un agente riesce a recuperarla?

  • Response is not compressed

    Enable Brotli or gzip for text responses. Compression cuts bytes transferred by ~70–80% and reduces crawl cost for every agent and bot that fetches your pages.

  • No ETag or Last-Modified header — conditional requests unsupported

    Send an ETag or Last-Modified header so crawlers can revalidate with If-None-Match / If-Modified-Since and receive a cheap 304 Not Modified instead of the full body.

  • Homepage size is reasonable (2.0 KB decompressed)

  • Roughly 0 tokens of content in 502 tokens of response (100% markup)

    An agent pays to receive the markup and then discards it. Serving Markdown on Accept negotiation is the direct fix.

  • Homepage responded in 9ms

  • GPTBot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • ClaudeBot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • Meta-ExternalAgent receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • Amazonbot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • Bytespider receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • CCBot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • OAI-SearchBot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • Claude-SearchBot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • PerplexityBot receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • ChatGPT-User receives a AWS WAF challenge instead of the page

    Challenge pages require running JavaScript. Crawlers that only fetch HTML — which is most of them — never get past one, so the page is effectively unavailable to them even though nothing is "blocked". Add a bot-management exception for verified AI crawlers. ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • 10 crawler probe(s) could not be settled from outside

    ax-audit sends this user agent from its own network without a Web Bot Auth signature, so an edge that verifies crawlers by IP range or signature will reject the probe while admitting the real crawler. Confirm against your WAF logs before changing any rule.

  • Site is served over HTTPS

  • HTTP requests redirect to HTTPS

  • HSTS max-age=63072000

  • HSTS includes subdomains

  • HSTS preload-eligible

  • Homepage is indexable

  • No directive restricts how AI assistants may use this page

  • Could not test 404 handling — the probe was challenged

    Bot management answered a plain GET with an interstitial, so status-code honesty could not be verified from outside.

  • Homepage answers without a redirect

  • HEAD requests are supported

  • Content-Type: text/html with charset

Individuabilità

55/100

Un agente trova ciò che pubblichi?

  • Sitemap located: https://booking.com/sitemap.xml

  • Sitemap response does not look like XML

    Serve the sitemap with valid XML and Content-Type: application/xml. Confirm the file starts with <?xml ...?> and contains <urlset> or <sitemapindex>.

  • No AI meta tags (ai:*) found

    Add AI meta tags to your HTML <head>: <meta name="ai:summary" content="Brief description">, <meta name="ai:content_type" content="website">, <meta name="ai:author" content="Your Name">.

  • No rel="alternate" link to llms.txt in HTML

    Add to your <head>: <link rel="alternate" type="text/plain" href="/llms.txt" title="LLM-optimized content">

  • No rel="alternate" link to the Agent Card in HTML

    Add to your <head>: <link rel="alternate" type="application/json" href="/.well-known/agent-card.json" title="Agent Card">

  • No rel="me" identity links found

    Add rel="me" links to verify your identity across platforms: <link rel="me" href="https://github.com/yourname">, <link rel="me" href="https://twitter.com/yourname">.

  • No OpenGraph meta tags found

    Add at minimum og:title, og:description, og:url, og:type, and og:image. Agents and link previews depend on these.

  • No Twitter Card meta tags found

    Add twitter:card, twitter:title, twitter:description, and twitter:image so X / Threads / Bluesky / Discord agents render link previews correctly.

  • /robots.txt exists

  • No core AI crawlers explicitly configured

    Add User-agent entries for core AI crawlers in your robots.txt. For each crawler, add: User-agent: <name> followed by Allow: / on the next line.

  • No Sitemap directive found

    Add a Sitemap directive to your robots.txt: Sitemap: https://your-site.com/sitemap.xml

  • No Content-Signal directive found (optional)

    Declare how crawlers may use your content after access with the Content Signals Policy, e.g.: Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-train=no. Known signals: search, ai-input, ai-train, plus the optional use=immediate|reference|full. Generate yours at contentsignals.org.

  • 0/57 known AI crawlers have explicit rules

    Add explicit User-agent entries for more AI crawlers to maximize discoverability.

  • /llms.txt exists

  • /llms.txt Content-Type is "text/html"

    Configure your server to serve /llms.txt as text/plain so AI agents parse it correctly.

  • Missing H1 heading (first line should start with "# ")

    Add an H1 heading as the first line of your llms.txt file, e.g.: # Your Site Name

  • No blockquote description found ("> ...")

    Add a blockquote description after the H1 heading, e.g.: > A brief summary of your site for AI agents.

  • No section headings found (## ...)

    Organize your llms.txt content with ## section headings (e.g., ## About, ## API, ## Documentation).

  • No Markdown links found

    Add Markdown links to relevant pages: [Page Title](https://example.com/page). This helps AI agents navigate your site.

  • /llms-full.txt also available (bonus)

  • No rel="describedby" link to llms.txt

    llms.txt v2 uses this relation so a page can name the file that covers it. Add <link rel="describedby" href="/llms.txt"> or the equivalent Link header, so an agent that landed on a deep page does not have to guess that an index exists.

  • No per-page Markdown mirror found

    llms.txt v2 documents appending .md to a URL for its Markdown version. The index tells an agent which pages exist; the mirrors are what make reading them cheap.

  • Consumer note: llms.txt is read by coding agents, not by search

  • Missing critical header: X-Content-Type-Options

    Add the X-Content-Type-Options response header to your server configuration. This is a critical security header.

  • Only 1/7 security headers present

    Add security headers like Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to your server response.

  • No Link header for AI discovery (llms.txt, Agent Card)

    Add a Link response header pointing to your AI discovery files: Link: </llms.txt>; rel="alternate"; type="text/plain", </.well-known/agent-card.json>; rel="alternate"; type="application/json"

  • No machine-readable discovery relations beyond llms.txt and the Agent Card

    Advertise what you publish with Link relations so agents stop guessing paths. Add the ones that apply, for example: Link: </llms.txt>; rel="describedby", </.well-known/api-catalog>; rel="api-catalog". Informational in 3.x: this does not affect your score.

Protocolli

0/100

Che cosa può chiamare un agente?

  • No agent resource catalog found

    A catalog is one document listing everything an agent can call here — agent cards, MCP servers, APIs, skills — so a client stops probing four conventions to find out. Worth publishing once you have more than one of those. Informational: both ai-catalog.json and ard.json are still drafts, so this never affects your score.

  • No agent-facing surface — an Agent Card does not apply to this site

  • No API surface — API discovery does not apply to this site

  • No MCP server — MCP discovery does not apply to this site

  • No developer-facing surface — skills do not apply to this site

  • No forms and no WebMCP code — nothing here for an agent to invoke as a tool

  • No commerce surface — agentic-commerce discovery does not apply to this site

  • Nothing on this site requires authorization — auth discovery does not apply

Criteri

44/100

Quali diritti d'uso sono dichiarati?

  • No RSL license discovery found

    Declare machine-readable licensing terms for your content with Really Simple Licensing. Add to robots.txt: License: https://your-site.com/license.xml — then publish the RSL document. See https://rslstandard.org.

  • No machine-readable usage policy declared

    State your terms where they can be read without a lawyer. The lowest-effort option is a Content-Signal line in robots.txt: Content-Signal: search=yes, ai-input=yes, ai-train=no. Absence is neutral, not permission — but it also gives you nothing to point at.

  • /.well-known/security.txt exists

  • Required field "Contact" present

  • Required field "Expires" present

  • Expires date is in the past — security.txt is expired

    Update the Expires field to a future date. RFC 9116 requires security.txt to have a valid, non-expired date.

  • 1/5 optional fields present

Dettagli tecnici

Motore
ax-audit@4.1.0
Scansionato
4 set 2026, 22:10:40 UTC
Durata
3719 ms
Check eseguiti
26

Trasforma questo rapporto in miglioramenti continui

Dai al team rapporti completi, correzioni prioritarie e monitoraggio per mantenere i miglioramenti dopo ogni rilascio.

Leggere questo report tramite l'API o il server MCP